State Department extends deadline for forcing diplomats to Iraq, hoping for volunteers

: The State Department states enough diplomatists have got volunteered for transportation to the U.S. Embassy in Republic Of Iraq to allow it detain the enactment of forcing people to function in the armed combat zone.

The section have set off until at least the end of the hebdomad the choice of foreign service military officers for so-called "directed assignments" in Republic Of Iraq as it looks for more than military volunteers to fill up 48 musca volitans that volition come up unfastened at the Bagdad embassy and outlying Iraki states this summer, section functionaries said.

Amid a fad over the possibility that some foreign service military officers might be forced to travel to Republic Of Iraq in the biggest diplomatic call-up since the Socialist Republic Of Vietnam War era, U.S. functionaries said that as of Tuesday morning, 25 military volunteers had been approved.

Twelve of the 23 remaining stations have got been filled tentatively, which raises hopes that the 11 unfastened places can be filled with military volunteers and led the department's Agency of Person Resources to detain the concluding choice process, the functionaries said.

Personnel panels had been owed to get Tuesday the procedure of choosing from among 200 to 300 diplomatists identified as "prime candidates" for Iraq. Those without compelling medical or household grounds who refused to travel would have got been subject to disciplinary action, including dismissal. Today in Americas

Despite the delay, the functionaries stressed that not all those identified were off the hook yet and that there stays a opportunity that a little figure of diplomatists might be ordered to Iraq.

"We very much mean to travel forward with this procedure of identifying people from the premier campaigners listing and, in the absence of military volunteers to fill up those remaining slots, assigning them to those places in Iraq," deputy sheriff State Department spokesman Uncle Tom Casey said.

"It is possible, though, that more than people will come up forward over the adjacent few years and ultimately do for a very little figure who might have got to be direct assigned," he told reporters.

Harry Thomas, manager full general of the Foreign Service, informed Deputy Secretary of State Toilet Negroponte of the rise figure of military volunteers on Friday. At the same time, Seth Thomas said he would detain the choice procedure until Nov. Sixteen at which clip he would re-evaluate the state of affairs and make up one's mind how to proceed, functionaries said.

Thomas' determination last calendar month to get the procedure of directed duty assignments for stations in Republic Of Iraq have sparked a decidedly undiplomatic difference in the foreign service that spilled into the public sphere after news studies emerged of a disputatious State Department town hallway meeting on the subject on Oct. 31.

At the meeting, 100s of diplomatists applauded when one of their co-workers likened a forced circuit in Republic Of Iraq to a "potential decease sentence" while some questioned the ethical motive of ordering unarmed civilians into a warfare zone and expressed concerns about a deficiency of preparation and medical attention for those who have got served.

Other diplomatists have got reacted angrily to the revolt, noting that foreign service military officers take a duty to stand for their authorities anywhere in the world, a point made by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a cablegram sent to all U.S. diplomatic stations on Nov. 2.

The opponent sides are now engaged in an often awful exchange that have surfaced on the State Department's functionary blog, which last hebdomad posted a harshly critical message from a calling diplomatist in Republic Of Iraq who accused those opposing to directed duty assignments of being coddled elitists and suggested they are "wimps and weenies."

Nearly 140 people, including some who place themselves as foreign service officers, had entered the affray on the Dipnote blog as of Tuesday, making it one of the most popular stations the two-month old venture have published.

More than 1,500 of roughly 11,500 foreign service military officers have got already served voluntarily in Iraq, where most are confined to the heavily fortified "Green Zone" for security.

Three foreign service force — two diplomatic security agents and one political military officer — have been killed in Republic Of Iraq since the warfare began in March 2003.

The labor union that stands for diplomatists states the state of affairs in Republic Of Iraq is unstable and the completion of a new embassy chemical compound and life living quarters in Bagdad have been harass by logistical and building problems.

The move to so-called "directed assignments" is rare but not unprecedented.

In 1969, an full social class of entry-level diplomats was sent to Vietnam. On a littler scale, diplomatists were required to work at assorted embassies in Occident Africa in the 1970s and 1980s.

___

On the Net:

State Department:

State Department blog:

Iraq Premier Sees Families Returning to Safer Capital

BAGHDAD, Nov. Eleven — The Iraki premier minister, , said in a news conference on Lord'S Day that increased security in Bagdad had allowed one thousands of households to go back to their places in the working capital and outlying areas. Range of War

Related (November 12, 2007)

The figure of self-destruction attacks, auto bombardments and other terrorist Acts have fallen 77 percentage in Bagdad from last year, Mr. Maliki said, adding that 7,000 households had returned to the capital. Together, Mr. Maliki said, the improvements showed "we were able, after eight calendar months of imposing the law, to drive Bagdad from its dark, achromatic years into a brighter clip that people experience optimistic about."

Mr. Maliki's averments were the up-to-the-minute in a series of aglow studies he have offered since the start of the security program in February. And while his appraisal of the diminution in force fits that of American armed forces commanders, it was not clear how he had tallied the figure of returning families, which functionaries state have got been exceedingly hard to locate. The significance of the tax returns is also a topic of debate.

Most of the capital's displaced people have got got yet to return, and the figure of those departure still outpaces those returning, according to Danu Graber Ladek, the Iraki shift specializer for the International Organization for Migration.

Over a million Iraqis have fled their places in the past twelvemonth and a half, she said, nearly three-quarters of them from Baghdad. And though the Iraki authorities is offering 1 million Iraki dinars, or roughly $812, to each Bagdad household that returns, she said, only a fraction of occupants have got done so.

"The security state of affairs is going to have to stabilise for a longer clip period of time in order for those Iraqis to experience safe," Ms. Ladek said. "We're not seeing monolithic tax returns yet." Nearly a 3rd of the people who make tax return to their places have got establish person else living in them, she said. Most returnees are also going back to religiously homogeneous neighborhoods, she said, where they experience safer and more than secure from sectarian strife.

According to recent estimations by the International Organization for Migration, since February 2006 the figure of people who have got got fled their places countrywide had been approximately 60,000 a month, Ms. Ladek said, adding that that figure have dipped markedly in recent calendar months as the force in Bagdad have ebbed.

The United States armed forces said Lord'S Day that rocket and howitzer onslaughts in have dipped to their last degree since February 2006, a lessening it linked to the addition in American troop degrees this year.

United States armed forces commanding officers said creating a safe system in which Iraqis can go back home, without forcing any homesteaders into the streets, will be one of the government's top challenges for the approaching year. The authorities and American armed military units leadership have got got been conducting censuses in Bagdad vicinities since the spring, and have hired local military volunteers to patrol the streets in an attempt to understand migration patterns.

"They desire to acquire back their places and their property," said Col. J. B. Burton, the commanding officer of the Second Brigade Combat Team of the First Infantry Division, which commands northwest Baghdad.

Meanwhile, latent hostilities remained high in Samarra, where, according to the military, the Iraki police force and alliance forces killed seven insurrectionists on Friday. Fight between the Muslim Army, a local Sunnite group, and , a home-grown grouping that American functionaries state is led by foreigners, also broke out close Samarra late Friday, a authorities functionary said, leaving 23 insurrectionists dead.

On Sunday, Maj. Gen. Crick Lynch, commanding officer of the Third Infantry Division in Iraq, said the find of Iranian-made arms here was increasing, Reuters reported. General Lynch said it was ill-defined whether the rise was because more than than arms were coming into Republic Of Iraq or because American military personnel were finding more caches.

Reporting was contributed by Damien Cave, Sir Leslie Stephen Farrell, Khalid al-Ansary and Qais Mizher from Baghdad, and an Iraki employee of The New House Of York Times from Samarra.

Bush Sees Iraq Progress From Troop Buildup

FORT JACKSON, S.C., Nov. Two — President Shrub offered an cheerful appraisal on Friday of advancement in , saying that while corruptness remained a job and unemployment was high, the economic system was growing, force was down and, "slowly but surely, the people of Republic Of Iraq are reclaiming a normal society." Range of War

Speaking to 1,300 alumni of the Army's basic preparation encampment here, Mr. Shrub gave his first advancement study on Republic Of Iraq since September, when he announced that his troop buildup would come up to an end by adjacent spring, with decreases beginning at the end of this year.

In the September speech, the president called the new scheme "return on success," a phrase he reiterated in his comments here on Friday.

To do his lawsuit that the scheme is working, Mr. Shrub ticked off a litany of statistics. Since the buildup was completed in June, he said, the figure of onslaughts each hebdomad involving I.E.D.'s, or improvised explosive devices, had dropped by half. The figure of American armed forces deaths, he said, had fallen to its last degree in 19 months.

With Karbala State moving to Iraki control this week, Mr. Shrub said Iraqis were now responsible for security in 8 of Iraq's 18 provinces.

"The Iraqis are becoming more than capable, and our military commanding officer states me that these additions are making possible what I name 'return on success,'" Mr. Shrub said. "That agency we're slowly bringing some of our military personnel place — and now we're doing it from a place of strength."

Mr. Shrub typically happens friendly audiences at military bases, and Friday was no exception; the alumni and their relations and friends applauded wildly as he arrived on the grassy parade field here, and they interrupted his comments respective modern times with ft stomping and cheers.

The address came as Mr. Shrub was pressing the Democratic-controlled Congress to O.K. an exigency disbursement measure for the warfares in Republic Of Iraq and Afghanistan. Argument on the disbursement measure may not take topographic point until early adjacent year, but some are already predicting that the Democrats may do another effort to coerce Mr. Shrub to switch scheme in Iraq, in order to convey the military personnel place more quickly than he had planned.

In a statement responding to Mr. Bush's speech, the Senate Democratic leader, of Nevada, accused the president of "overstating the security situation" in Iraq.

"While the lessening in U.S. and Iraki civilian deceases is welcome news, force stays high in Iraq," Mr. Thomas Reid said. "Our primary end — political rapprochement — is still out of reach, and Iraki security military units have got not met the duties the president himself laid out for them when he proclaimed his escalation scheme in January."

When Mr. Shrub first announced the troop buildup in January, he said it was intended to give the authorities of Prime Curate "breathing space" to construct a cohesive cardinal authorities that could bridge over the sectarian divisions that were ripping Republic Of Iraq apart. Mr. Shrub conceded Friday that "reconciliation at the national degree hasn't been what we hoped it'd been by now," and said he had "made my letdowns clear to the Iraki leadership."

But he argued, as he have in the past, that rapprochement was taking topographic point at the local level, and that Shi'Ite and Sunnite leadership were beginning to collaborate with one another to struggle against , a homegrown extremist grouping that American intelligence federal agencies state is foreign-led.

Mr. Shrub also took the unusual measure of offering a body-count figure, saying that together with Iraki forces, American military personnel had killed or captured an norm of more than than 1,500 "enemy fighters" per calendar month since January.

On the economical front, the president argued that Iraki society was beginning to go back to normal.

"We're seeing improvements in of import economical indicators," he said. "Inflation have been cut in half. Electricity production in September reached its peak degrees since the warfare began — and higher than it was under ."

Another 50 Billion Dollars for Iraq

I woke up this morning time thought about Iraq. Last nighttime I learned President Shrub have asked for another 50 billion dollars to cover the cost of the Republic Of Iraq war. Some news federal agencies study the cost of the warfare is now at 3 billion dollars a week.

How much more than agony can be inflicted on the Iraki people for another 50 billion? How many more than American soldiers will be killed while disbursement that 50 billion? Who is going to acquire that 50 billion dollars? What is not being done in this state because another 50 billion is going to person waiting in Iraq?

Do some reading online and you can happen studies of the dingy statuses in Iraq. The substructure is so mediocre that in Bagdad the electricity is on about 8 hours per day. That is the Capitol metropolis and is the most developed metropolis in the country. Other topographic points are even worse with sewerage in the streets and no imbibing water. Forget about electricity.

Are we to disbelieve these studies are just broad faultfinding and arrested development on the jobs in Iraq? Or can we look at this and recognize money is just being shoveled down a achromatic hole? Companies have got been paid millions for Reconstruction work on substructure and the state of affairs is still abysmal. About 20 billion dollars appropriated by United States Congress four old age ago for Reconstruction have been spent.

Take Bechtel for example. This company have been paid 1.3 billion dollars for sewerage undertaking work. Less than one-half of the undertakings have got been completed. About 40 percentage of their measures for work have got been for "support" costs. Nearly 250 million dollars have been billed under the class "Other". I am certain this form is repeated over and over again with these "no command contracts".

I was looking at a listing of the top 200 contractors for the Federal Soldier Government. KBR, a subordinate of Halliburton, is figure 6 on the list, you will remember the Frailty President's human relationship to Halliburton. Almost 6 billion dollars for KBR from the Department of Defense. The top 5 are a who's who of weaponry makers.

Verizon received over 200 million in Defense Contracts from the Department of Defense. And there is old Blackwater USA, the private materialistic contractor at just below 600 million dollars. Blackwater is the employer of former armed forces people, White Person South African military, South American thugs, and Central American decease squad members. Read Jeremy Scahill's book about Blackwater USA.

This is all published information and probably legal. But, it is interesting who acquires what from the government. A tragical outcome, and also a form in the Shrub Administration is, people who have got got blown the whistle on corruptness in Republic Of Iraq have actually been punished. For audacious to describe illegal weaponry sales, Navy veteran soldier Donald Vance states he was imprisoned by the American military in a security chemical compound outside Bagdad and subjected to rough question methods.

Vance made his study to the Federal Bureau of Investigation business office in Windy City because there was no 1 in Republic Of Iraq he could trust. He revealed an weaponry selling operation that was selling anything to anyone who had the money. These were the weaponry intended for usage by the United States armed forces being sold to insurgents. Vance tried to expose it and lesion up in prison house being tortured.

Apparently, the unspoken word in Republic Of Iraq is don't state anything about corruptness or incorrect doing because you will be destroyed for doing so. A very neat agreement for any corporation who desires to do a buck.

Think tank: Europe must steer Kosovo to independence or face renewed conflict

PRISTINA, Serbia: An international think tank said Tuesday that the European Union should support independence for Kosovo or risk plunging the region into violence.

New talks between ethnic Albanians and Serbia are likely to fail, the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based think tank, said in a report, adding that the EU's failure to form a common position on Kosovo's independence would have "very disturbing consequences for Europe."

"If it is incapable once again, it would almost certainly lead to bloodshed and renewed regional chaos that would blow back into Central and Western Europe in the form of refugees and stronger organized crime networks," said Sabine Freizer of ICG.

Kosovo has been under United Nations and NATO control since 1999 after NATO's 78-day air war against Yugoslavia, waged to stop a crackdown on the province's separatist ethnic Albanians.

The report, titled "Breaking the Kosovo Stalemate: Europe's Responsibility," called upon the bloc to coordinate a unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo's ethnic Albanian leaders if talks between the two sides, slated to end by Dec. 10, do not result in an agreement.




Today in Europe

However, it urged Western diplomats to "restrain Kosovo Albanians from unilateral actions," fearing an unsupervised declaration of independence could prompt leaders in Kosovo's Serb-dominated north to respond with a separatist move of their own.

Envoys from United States, the European Union and Russia launched a 120-day effort to end the impasse over Kosovo after Russia's threat to block in the U.N. Security Council a Western-backed plan to grant the province internationally supervised independence.

The plan, drafted by former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari, would give broad rights to the Serb minority in Kosovo and proposes that the province separate from Serbia after a period of international supervision under EU leadership.

The 37-page report of the International Crisis Group urged the EU and U.S. to enforce the Ahtisaari plan, despite Russia's opposition to Kosovo's independence.

Ethnic Albanian leaders and Serbian officials are to hold the next round of talks with international envoys Aug. 30 in Vienna, Austria. Both sides have expressed doubt that an agreement can be reached.

Hashim Thaci, an ethnic Albanian negotiator, said Tuesday the province's leaders "will be very clear, cooperative and determined that Kosovo's independence be official and recognized very soon by the U.S., EU and that Russia should not in any way be allowed to unilaterally prevent this."

Kosovo's leaders insist on independence from Serbia following the 1998-99 conflict that left 10,000 dead in the face of an onslaught from Serbian forces. Serbia considers the territory an integral part of the country.

"If Kosovo explodes because the independence issue is mishandled, the regional risks would include that eight years worth of international resources and prestige dedicated to managing the crisis would be lost," the report said.

"The genie of ethnic conflict would be let loose again."

A Successful Iraqi Exit Strategy

Jimmy Carter was right. George W. Bush has been the worst president! Who the hell invades a country and just brings democracy? When you go to a friend's house for dinner, you bring a bottle of wine, some dessert, right? You don't go to your friends and say, "Hi, we didn't bring anything, but we were thinking that the pork chops should be divided evenly and let's take a vote on whether we eat the salad before or after the main course."

If I were president I would have brought brownies for the Sunnis. And not just any old brownies, the good ones with huge walnut chunks and maybe with some caramel spread on top. The Shi'ites would have gotten chocolate chip cookies like only Americans know how to make them. And I may have even put a Hershey's kiss on top of each cookie. How can anyone hate you when you've given them a kiss?

Now everybody loves us, except maybe the Kurds. I forgot about the Kurds. They get to have a little sampling of both. Let's face it, the Kurds have had a rough century; they could use two desserts.

I can't stay forever making cookies and brownies. I have other countries to feed and will need to car pool my daughter to her ballet and soccer games. So here's our exit strategy. The Sunnis love their brownies and the Shia love their cookies. So we do a little reversal and give the Sunnis (who love the brownies) the recipe to make the cookies (and perhaps ask Hershey's to send a few million kisses wholesale) and give to the Shia (who love the cookies) the recipe to make brownies. Now, next Thursday when the Sunnis want their brownies, they're going to have to ask the Sunnis to make it for them. Of course, they'll agree to do it since their going to want the Shias to make them their cookies.

We have created interdependence. And we have finally brought some good desserts to a region that has suffered far too long from some pretty boring desserts all made with honey. What if you don't like honey? You can't have baba ghanoush or hummus for dessert!

Now I've still forgotten the Kurds. O.K. we will give them the recipe for both so that if the Shias are busy one weekend, the Kurds can make the brownies. But the Kurds can't have any ovens, because if they have ovens and both recipes, they're going to want to be an independent country.

You know how around Christmas time you melt some chocolate and then spread crushed candy canes over it? I think the Iranians would love that. Maybe even enough to give up their nuclear program.

U.S. Senate to vote on whether to cut off money for Iraq war in 2008

WASHINGTON: The Senate is expected to vote as early as this week on whether to cut off money for the Iraq war next year, as well as on a softer measure calling for U.S. troops to leave by October.

Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday the two measures would be offered as amendments to a water projects funding bill being debated this week. While the Senate had planned to take up Iraq legislation this week, Reid had previously been unclear what specifics members would consider.

The first amendment, backed by Reid and Sen. Russ Feingold, would require that combat operations end by March 31, 2008, by cutting off money after that date.

The second measure would provide more than $120 billion (€88.5 billion) to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as various domestic projects. It would call for troops to begin leaving Iraq by Oct. 1, but allow the president to waive that requirement.

Passage of the $120 billion (€88.5 billion) in war spending would not allow the Senate to begin negotiating with the House of Representatives and send President George W. Bush a bill by the end of the month, said Rodell Mollineau, a Reid spokesman. Nevertheless, he added, "these are important votes. This will give members an opportunity to debate these issues and have up-or-down votes on these."




Today in Americas

The House last week approved, 221-205, legislation that would fund the war in two-month installments, giving Congress a chance to cut off money for the war after July. The House measure was considered unlikely to survive in the Senate, where Democrats wanted to fund the war through September.

"On our side of the aisle, Democrats believe they should do something very, very close to what was done in the bill that was sent to the president to be vetoed," said Reid.

Reid's strategy is likely to appease party members like Feingold who say they will not vote for legislation that funds the deeply unpopular war without binding language demanding U.S. troops leave. While Reid co-sponsored Feingold's proposal, he has said he would not push it as a caucus position.

"The American people deserve to have the Senate go on record about whether or not it wants to end our misguided mission in Iraq and safely redeploy our brave troops," said Feingold.

However, Feingold's tough anti-war measure is unlikely to pass the Senate, where Democrats hold a narrow majority and several oppose using the budget to end the war.

Amid Friction, Plans for U.S.-Iran Talks on Iraq

CAIRO, May 13 — The diplomatic tussle between and the United States intensified Sunday as leaders from both countries toured Middle Eastern capitals seeking to shore up relationships, even as signs of new cooperation over emerged between them.

Iran’s president, , arrived in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday afternoon, the first trip there by an Iranian leader since the country’s founding in 1971, seeking to improve a strategic trade partnership just as Vice President landed in Cairo as part of a Middle East tour meant to mollify America’s regional allies and strengthen support against Iran.

The visits occurred as officials from both countries announced that Ryan C. Crocker, the American ambassador to Iraq, would meet with his Iranian counterpart in Baghdad in coming weeks to discuss Iraqi security efforts and cooperation between the countries.

In the Emirates’ capital, Abu Dhabi, Mr. Ahmadinejad met with Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan, the president, and with Dubai’s ruler, Sheik Muhammad bin Rahid al-Maktoum, the Emirates’ vice president, seeking to emphasize the importance of Iran’s relationship with the Emirates, the official Iranian news agency IRNA reported.

“We consider progress and prosperity of the U.A.E. as our own,” Mr. Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying.

But the Emirates’ leaders sought to ease the confrontation between the United States and Iran. Sheik Khalifa told Mr. Ahmadinejad that the Emirates sought the “elimination of the causes of tension in the Middle East,” especially in the Persian Gulf, the Emirates’ official news agency WAM reported.

“He is on a damage-control mission,” said Abdel Khaliq Abdallah, a professor of political science at United Arab Emirates University, referring to Mr. Ahmadinejad. “So maybe it’s about time for us to be as frank as possible that we really think he and Iran are playing a dangerous game with the world community.”

Later Sunday, Mr. Ahmadinejad went to Dubai, where he met with members of the Iranian Business Council, an Iranian trade group, and members of the Iranian community. Dubai is home to more than 500,000 Iranians who rely on the emirate as a focal point for trade and travel.

Speaking to several hundred people, many of them flag-waving Iranians, in a highly unusual political gathering held in a soccer stadium, he called for America to leave the region, The Associated Press reported. “The nations of the region can no longer take you forcing yourself on them,” he was quoted as saying.

At almost the same time, Mr. Cheney landed in Cairo for three hours of talks with President and top military officials to discuss Iraq as well as Iran’s growing regional influence. The vice president made no public comment after his visit here, part of a swing through the Middle East that included visits to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and an American warship in the Persian Gulf.

Mr. Mubarak’s spokesman said Mr. Cheney had “focused especially on the situation in Iraq and the gulf, the security arrangements of the gulf and the relation with the Iranian nuclear program.”

Despite the growing tensions between the United States and Iran, the announcement of planned talks on Iraq brought new hope for cooperation to help stabilize Iraq. A previous plan for talks fell through.

“Following consultations between Iranian and Iraqi officials, Tehran has agreed to hold negotiations with Washington to relieve pain and suffering of the Iraqi people, support and strengthen the government of and stabilize security and peace in that country,” said Mohammad Ali Hosseini, the spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, in comments reported by IRNA.

White House officials said the talks flowed from an effort by the two countries, including meetings on the margins of conferences on stabilizing Iraq that were held in Baghdad in March and in Cairo last week.

“The purpose is to try to make sure that the Iranians play a productive role in Iraq,” the White House spokesman, Gordon D. Johndroe, told reporters on Air Force One en route to Virginia. “This is an ongoing process of trying to make sure that Iraq’s neighbors, of which Iran is obviously a major one, play a constructive role.”

Michael Slackman reported from Cairo, and Hassan M. Fattah from Beirut, Lebanon. Nada El-Sawy contributed reporting from Dubai, and Sheryl Gay Stolberg from Air Force One.

Arianna Huffington: Tony Blair's Legacy: George Bush's Iraq Trump Card

Arianna Huffington 47 minutes ago

With on his slow-bleed resignation, we can expect the floodgates to open on stories analyzing his ten year run as prime minister and the impact he had on America.

"Hand on heart," he said in announcing he will leave office at the end of June, "I did what I thought was right. I may have been wrong. That's your call. But believe one thing: I did what I thought was right for our country."

Maybe so, but his hand-on-heartfelt convictions had dire consequences for U.S. foreign policy. Blair was exactly what George W. Bush needed to sell his fraudulent and immoral war in to the American public: a seemingly reasonable and non-partisan stamp of international approval (after all, he'd been bosom buddies with , hadn't he?). Blair enabled the Bush myth that the invasion of Iraq was a coalition effort, that it wasn't just Mongolia, Moldova, Singapore, Poland, and Tonga making up the Coalition of the Willing to Go Along. It was Britain. Great Britain.

More than being just Bush and Cheney's cheery wingman, Blair was one of their top salesmen, pitching dossiers, Nigeran yellowcake, and the specter of chemical weapons "" raining down on Europe. Although Blair was far from the only enabler to Bush's Iraq fantasies -- spineless Congressional Democrats and a wildly compliant press certainly did their part -- the impact of his unwavering support was enormous.

Iraq is 's war, but Tony Blair's legacy will be forever tainted by the part of it he claimed for his own.

Blair made Bush's ordeal in Iraq less lonely, but it cost him

WASHINGTON: The Iraq war has been a lonely quest for President George W. Bush, but it has been less so thanks to the unwavering backing of British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Blair is stepping down on June 27 after a decade in power, and no issue during his tenure is leaving a more indelible imprint than his no-apologies support for the U.S.-led war effort.

Bush seemed optimistic Thursday about the possibility of continuity on Iraq between Blair and his likely successor, Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, the government's financial chief.

The president told reporters on Thursday that he believes Brown "understands the consequences of failure" in Iraq. As Bush sees it, a U.S. defeat would give a boost to terror everywhere.

Britain ranks second, after the United States, in terms of troops committed to Iraq. The British total is 7,100 but a reduction to 5,000 is planned for late this year.






Today in Americas

With Blair's announcement, Bush faces the final 19 months of his term in office without his closest ally and, as the president described him, "good friend."

The two appear to have a relaxed relationship. In Russia last year, unaware that a nearby microphone was on, Bush was heard to greet his colleague with a "Yo, Blair," leaving the prime minister embarrassed.

While there was shared anguish over the maelstrom in Iraq, neither leader has given any hint of regret over the venture. Both have paid a dear price politically, scoring under 30 percent in polls, the fallout from a war that is highly unpopular in both the United States and Britain.

Julianne Smith, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said there is no question that Blair's legacy "will suffer from the stain of Iraq."

Blair, she said, was content to "cozy up to the United States to the bitter end, refusing to look back and question his choice."

Charles Kupchan, of the Council on Foreign Relations, said Blair "leaves under a cloud, having lost the confidence of his own party and with the Conservatives well ahead in the polls."

A month ago, Brown met with Bush for the first time without Blair being present. The two men spoke for a half-hour after Bush dropped in on a meeting between Brown and U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley. Brown was in Washington for meetings at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

"I have found him to be an open and engaging person," Bush said, also describing him as an "easy-to-talk-to, good thinker."

On Iraq, Brown had promised to "spend what it takes" to disarm Saddam Hussein's Iraq. He is expected to keep British troops in Iraq for the near future, and to maintain Britain's strong relationship with America.

While Brown's ultimate course on Iraq is unclear, Europe has been generally projecting a friendlier image toward the United States. The latest concrete example is the recent election of Nicolas Sarkozy as president of France, which followed the accession in Germany of Chancellor Angela Merkel in late 2005.